{"id":6151,"date":"2021-01-29T17:14:40","date_gmt":"2021-01-29T17:14:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/?p=6151"},"modified":"2022-12-29T16:28:32","modified_gmt":"2022-12-29T16:28:32","slug":"three-ways-to-keep-up-with-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/?p=6151","title":{"rendered":"Three Ways to Keep Up with Change"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Three Ways to Keep Up with Change<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These days many well-established mission organizations operate on a significant bet. The bet is the funds&nbsp; they raise will achieve good results. Mission is driven by practices built on time-honored tradition.&nbsp; Organizational legacy keeps them within tried-and-true boundaries and paradigms. Group think hinders&nbsp; their ability to keep learning. As time marches on, the odds are increasingly stacked against them.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Change is no respecter of legacy or tradition. Science keeps discovering, inventors keep inventing,&nbsp; innovators keep disrupting, and creative processes keep getting more creative. This thought seems trite.&nbsp; Everyone knows change happens, yet many do not look out for it, seek to understand it, adjust to it, or&nbsp; even acknowledge it. When this happens, an organization\u2019s effectiveness declines. Irrelevancy is not far&nbsp; behind. Over time, people\u2014along with their funding\u2014move to where they think they can achieve greater&nbsp; results. It\u2019s nothing new.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\">A few highly significant changes that have taken place in global missions over the last 50 years&nbsp;<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p>1. The West is no longer the center of Christianity. That would be Africa. And there are now more&nbsp; Christians living in non-Western countries than there are in Western countries.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2. Former missionary receiving countries, like Brazil, India, Philippines, Korea and others have&nbsp; become missionary sending countries.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>3. Indigenous missionaries do 90% of pioneer mission work, but only receive 10% of mission funding.&nbsp; Meanwhile, foreign missionaries do 10% of pioneer mission work but receive 90% of mission&nbsp; funding. (Finley 2004, 178 &amp; 244)<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\">DISRUPT YOURSELVES&nbsp;<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p>As the old saying goes, if you keep doing the same things, you keep getting the same results. However,&nbsp; because the world changes, you get diminishing results. To keep up with change organizations need to&nbsp; occasionally disrupt themselves before donors do it for them.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A speaker at the Innovation and Entrepreneurship for a Disruptive World Forum explained it this way:&nbsp; \u201cDisruptive means, innovative ideas that disrupt the status quo when the status quo is no longer effective&nbsp; in achieving mission and impact.\u201d<sup>1<\/sup>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Disruption sounds negative. We usually consider disruption as something annoying because it&nbsp; interferes with processes. But if we don\u2019t test our own assumptions about the effectiveness of our mission&nbsp; work, we don\u2019t really know if our methods are still producing good results.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Three Steps to Self-disruption&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p>The following action items can help any social nonprofit or mission agency improve performance. Doing&nbsp; these things require patience, discipline, and determination simply because they are disrupters of the&nbsp; status quo.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>1. Ensure New Learning (Bust Your Own Myths)&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Over time closed groups, such as working teams and departments, develop group thinking. As a result,&nbsp; learning decreases, and work culture becomes entrenched and resistant to change. Faith organizations (e.g.,&nbsp; missions and churches) tend to draw on internal staff rather than hire an outside expert to help them think&nbsp;about what needs to change and how.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nevertheless, it is important for these leaders to bring in such corporate outsiders because, without&nbsp;external feedback, leaders don\u2019t know what they don\u2019t know. A good consultant can skillfully ask the&nbsp; \u201cdumb\u201d questions. Dumb questions are questions leaders assume answers to and never talk about. A&nbsp; good consultant knows how to facilitate discussions that examine basic assumptions which drive the&nbsp; organization.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So often, the leaders will discover they don\u2019t assume the same things, and what they do assume often&nbsp;no longer fits with the times. External consultants help with this important discovery process. In a way,&nbsp; they are disruptive outsiders who bring the team together to develop fresh insights. This is necessary&nbsp; because of organizational groupthink, which stifles creativity and innovation.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2. Foster Group Diversity&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The notion of crowdsourcing is not as much about numbers as it is about diversity. The more diverse knowledge, experience, and wisdom brought to a problem, the greater the chance solutions will be found.&nbsp; Even on a small scale, diversifying is disruptive when new staff join a team, especially if they are younger&nbsp; and seem a bit brash.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So often, solutions arise when this kind of disruption happens. It can be discomforting to a team that&nbsp; has enjoyed their comfort zone for a long time. Nevertheless, if you want to achieve greater success with&nbsp; the resources you have, then make yourself and your team a bit uncomfortable by mixing in staff members&nbsp; who have different perspectives.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>3. Maintain a Safe Climate for Learning and Experimenting&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>How safe do staff members feel when exercising creativity within the organization? Are they afraid to raise&nbsp; an issue, ask a dumb question, or suggest a crazy idea? Do they have space to try new things without fear?&nbsp; Typically, a hierarchical structure prevents creativity from flourishing. Reporting structures may make trying&nbsp; new things too daunting. Supervisors may fear losing authority or control. Some order needs to be&nbsp; maintained to ensure good operations. However, if creative and innovative work is not flourishing on the&nbsp; margins, finding ways to move the tested results to the core, the organization will lose its effective edge.&nbsp; Leaders need to ensure that people have the freedom and safety to try new things and even fail. That&nbsp;is, if failure is not overly expensive and produces valuable learning that moves the mission forward.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The rate of change in the globalized age requires nimbleness, flexibility, intentionality, and&nbsp; perseverance. Rethinking strategies, operations, and mission values is not a luxury only if you have the&nbsp; time. Rather, the future of your organization may depend on it.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Example: How Wycliffe Bible Translators Disrupted Itself&nbsp;<\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p>Years ago, Wycliffe Bible Translators leaders knew at the rate their organization was working, it would&nbsp; take 150 years to see all languages with Bible translations. So they did something radical. They started a&nbsp; new organization to run ahead and make necessary changes to the translation paradigm. They started an&nbsp; organization that focused exclusively on helping people do Bible translation in their own language. They&nbsp; didn\u2019t have to wait years for a Western missionary to come and do that for them. This move completely&nbsp; changed the paradigm and resulted in a surge in Bible translation efforts, reducing the completion goal&nbsp; by several decades. To achieve this Wycliffe and the new organization did four important things:&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>1. Wycliffe turned over control to the new start-up organization.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>2. When that organization started, there were no sacred cow topics. Everything was on the table for&nbsp; discussion.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>3. Their own history and legacy took a back seat to what was most important going forward.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00a04. They were willing to regularly examine how their processes and strategies were serving their goals.\u00a0 They made changes when results were unsatisfying.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Written by Gilles Gravelle&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Gilles is the Director of Moving Missions. This article first appeared in Gilles\u2019 book <em>So What? Answering a Donor\u2019s Toughest Question <\/em>(Amazon.com). It has&nbsp; been shortened and updated for this article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Copyright Moving Missions 2021<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><br><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"brz-root__container\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Everyone knows change happens, yet many do not look out for it, seek to understand it, adjust to it, or  even acknowledge it. Here&#8217;s why you should.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":10582,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"brizy-blank-template.php","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-all-articles","category-trends-shifts","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6151"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6151\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10585,"href":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6151\/revisions\/10585"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/10582"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/movingmissions.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}